TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (6) TMI 87
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ORDER PER SAKTIJIT DEY. J.M. Aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee challenging the order dated 1st May 2017, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-42, Mumbai, confirming penalty of Rs. 25,80,510, imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act") for the assessment year 2008-09. 2. Brief facts are, the assessee, a partnership firm, f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....worked out to Rs. 75,91,967. The assessee challenged the aforesaid disallowance before the first appellate authority. 3. Learned Commissioner (Appeals) after considering the submissions of the assessee deleted the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. However, while disposing off the appeal filed by the Revenue against the aforesaid order of learned Commissioner (Appeals), the Tribunal, in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....oubt about the genuineness of the expenditure claimed. Thus, he submitted, the case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income is not made out. Therefore, he submitted, the penalty imposed should be deleted. 5. The learned Departmental Representative strongly relied upon the observations of the Assessing Officer and learned Commissioner (Appeals). 6. We have considered rival submissions a....