Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1346

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r chapter 72 and 73 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, for lack of conformity with the definition of 'capital goods' in rule 2(a) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 or of 'inputs' in rule 2(k) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned order has confirmed demand of Rs. 15,31,12,279/- under rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, read with section 11AB/11AA of Central Excise Act, 1944, besides imposing penalties under rule 15(1) and rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 read with section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 . 2. According to Learned Counsel for appellant, the adjudicating authority, while denying the eligibility for credit had ignored the submissions made by them that the inputs had been utilized for mainte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e inputs, used in the maintenance and repair of equipment and plant and machinery in the workshop, are eligible had been decided against them on the ground that specific details had not been made available to identify the inputs attributable to such maintenance and repair. Likewise, on the claim that the inputs were used for manufacture of capital goods there is a specific finding of lack of adequate information to identify the inputs that were employed for such eligible production. We also find that the details are before us and had been laid before the original authority. Had this information been deficient, it was incumbent upon the adjudicating authority to place the appellant on notice of such and require production of data that would ....