Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2014 (10) TMI 1004

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red in deleting the addition of Rs. 3,00,63,000/- made on account of unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961 without considering the fact that the identity of creditors, capacity of creditors to advance the money and genuineness of transaction were not proved during the assessment proceedings. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in ignoring the fact that books of accounts being incorrect, incomplete and unreliable were correctly rejected and therefore deduction u/s 80P(2)(i) of the I.T. Act, 1961 was not allowable in the case." 2. The facts of the case are brought out in para No. 2 of the assessment order which is extracted for your ready reference :- "The assessee is a Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the assessee." 4. On appeal the first appellate authority deleted the addition. 5. Aggrieved the revenue is in appeal. 6. We have heard Shri J.P. Chandraker, Departmental Representative on behalf of the revenue and Shri Ved Jain and Smt. Rano Jain on behalf of the assessee. 7. On a careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and a perusal of the papers on record and the orders of the authorities below we hold as follows :- The undisputed fact is that the assessee is a thrift & credit cooperative society, registered with Registrar of Co-operative Society, New Delhi since 1991. It is governed & regulated as per the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972. The main object of the society is to promote the econom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n admitted fact that the assessee Society is thrift and credit co-operative society, registered with Registrar of Co-operative Society, New Delhi. The society is engaged in the business of lending and taking deposits only to/from its members. The society collects the money from members in cash/cheque mainly against the repayment of loans, interest on loan, fixed deposit, admission fee, share capital, etc. and they deposit the same in bank accounts. I am of the opinion that since the society is a thrift & credit co-operative society, therefore source of cash deposited in the bank of Rs. 3,00,63,224/- out of the cash receipt received from its members against the repayment of loans, interest on loan, fixed deposit, admission fee, share capital....