Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
Upgrade to AI Tools ✕

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools →

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2018 (8) TMI 1811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....And Ms. Hafsa Khan For The Respondent. ORDER The petitioner's grievance is that its entitlement to refund of about Rs. 1,50,50,577/-, with interest for the period June, 2010 to March, 2012, has been unjustifiably withheld. The Government of NCT of Delhi i.e. the respondents, were unable to justify the basis for the impugned orders which accepted the returns and generated "zero demands" and at ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t (on 13.06.2012, 06.08.2012 and 08.08.2012) had remained unserved and as a result, the refund claims could not be acceded to, and in fact, were rejected. This Court has considered the submissions. The authority of the ruling in Prime Papers & Packers v. Commissioner of VAT & Anr. WP(C) 6013/2016 decided on 28.07.2016 clearly states that the notice under Section 59 of the DV AT Act, if at al....

PrevPreviousNextNext