Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llenged the selection process for the post of Member of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2. Vide circular dated 06th July, 2018, the Government invited applications for appointment to the posts of Member (Judicial/Accountant), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).  The qualifications of the Judicial Member, ITAT as given in para 5(a) of the circular are reproduced hereunder: "5 QUALIFICATIONS:- (a) JUDICIAL MEMBER:- A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judicial Member unless:- (i) he has for at least ten years held a judicial office in the territory of India; or (ii) he has been a Member of the Indian Legal Service and has held a post in Grade-II of the Service or any equivalent or h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ort-list candidates (two or three times the number of vacancies) in the first round.  The Committee in its meeting dated 01st May, 2019 decided to consider only complete applications received by 20th August, 2018.  The Committee further resolved to call for interview 24 most experienced applicants from the profession i.e. practicing advocates and others (from the list prepared in decreasing number of experience) belonging to unreserved category against 9 unreserved posts.  The Committee decided to hold the interviews of the short-listed candidates in the Supreme Court on 20th and 21st May, 2019.  Learned Standing counsel for the Central Government has produced the sealed envelope containing the minutes of the Search-cum-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orporation Ltd. v. Ayodhya Prashad Mishra, (2008) 10 SCC 139, B. Amrutha Lakshmi v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2013) 16 SCC 440 and Prakash Chand Meena v. State of Rajasthan, (2015) 8 SCC 484. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent urged at the time of hearing that: 5.1 The petitioners are reading Section 252 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 erroneously inasmuch as Section 252 provides for minimum practice of 10 years for advocates to be considered for the post of Member, Judicial ITAT.  It is submitted that Section 252 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is to be read in conjunction with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules 1963 which have been framed in exercise of the powers conferred by the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....July, 2018 for 37 members (Judicial/ Accountant) in ITAT. Considering the huge number of applications received for the above-mentioned posts, the interim Search-cum-Selection Committee deemed it fit to conjointly read Section 252 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 4A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963. Considering the above provisions, guidelines, status of applications and on perusal of list of candidates in decreasing order of their experience, the interim Search-cum-Selection Committee decided to call 24 most experienced applicants who were practicing Advocates for interview. 5.5 The above-mentioned principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court in catena of judgments whe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Union of India v. T. Sundararaman, AIR 1997 SC 2418 and Arun Tewari v. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh, AIR 1998 SC 331. 5.7 The petitioner in W.P.(C) 5365/2019 submitted the application after the last date of submission prescribed in the circular dated 06th July, 2018 and therefore, his candidature was rejected by the Committee. 5.8 The petitioner in W.P.(C) 5361/2019 is having only 13 years of practice as an Advocate and therefore, his name is not amongst the short-listed candidates. 6. On careful consideration of the rival contentions of the parties, this Court is of the view that Rule 4A of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963 empowers the Selection Board to evolve its own pr....