2019 (5) TMI 1056
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....venue : Shri Abhiskek Kumar, Sr. DR ORDER PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] 27, New Delhi dated 10.01.2018 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09. 2. The solitary grievance raised by the assessee is that the CIT(A) erred in upholding penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in case of Pro.CIT vs. Ram Avtar Verma, reported in (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 666, has held as under: "4. The Revenue urges that the non-obstante clause in Section 153A together with Section 158BD removes the barrier vis-a- vis restriction upon search assessments being confined to "undisclosed income". In other words, it is stated that none of the provisions confine the enquiry of the AO to e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Revenue could possibly have faced hurdles in regard to unadopted/current assessment years as well as reassessment proceedings pending at the time of the search in respect of which proceedings were to be completed under Sections 153A/ 153C. Having regard to the above directions, we are of the opinion that the ITAT decision does not call for interference. Both appeals are accordingly dismissed." ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI