2019 (5) TMI 1043

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....shra, Advocate. O R D E R 1.The Petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by the refusal by the Respondents to refund the pre-deposit amount of Rs. 2 lacs along with interest for the periods March, 2010-11 and March, 2011-12. 2. The Petitioner is registered under the DVAT Act as well as under the Central Sales Tax Act ('CST Act'). The Petitioner was assessed for the above tax period of Mar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ide. The matter was remanded to the Value Added Tax Officer ('VATO') for framing a fresh assessment. 5. The VATO issued notices to the Petitioner under Section 59 (2) of the DVAT Act on 8th November, 2017 and 4th May, 2018, calling for documents. The Petitioner states that its authorized representative ('AR') appeared before the VATO on several dates with all the requisite documents. Neither was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 4th July, 2017. 9. Learned counsel for the Respondents does not dispute the above position. Accordingly, as far as the refund by the Revenue in the sum of Rs. 2 lacs of the Petitioner is concerned, it is directed that it shall be done forthwith, and in any event, not later than 31st May, 2019. 10. On the question of the interest that is payable to the P....