2019 (5) TMI 970

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Prabhudesai, Supdtt. (A.R.) for the Respondent ORDER PER: D.M. MISRA This is an appeal filed against OIO No. No.36/CEX/2008, dt.31.12.2008, passed by the CCE Nasik. 2. This is second round of litigation before this Tribunal. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of goods falling under Chapter 42 and 92 of Central Excise Act, 1944.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. 46,68,349/- and imposed penalty equivalent to the said duty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. 3. The learned Advocate for the Appellant submits that this Tribunal has remanded the matter to the Adjudicating authority for re-calculation of the duty, taking into account the quantity discount not passed on to the customer by adding the same to the price. There is no direction on p....