2013 (5) TMI 1006
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Kulkarni ORDER We have heard the counsel for the parties. The revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law and on facts in deleting the addition on account of technical know-how of Rs. 61,20,05,000/- and royalty of Rs. 81,71,60,464/- paid by the assessee to Honda Motor Co. Ltd. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....to Rs. 97,98,566/- Insofar as proposed question No. 2 is concerned, that issue stands covered in favour of the respondent / assessee by virtue of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Samtel Color Ltd. decided in Civil Appeal No. 6448/2012 on 12.09.2012. Consequently that question does not arise any further. As regards proposed question No. 3, the issue is also covered in f....
TaxTMI