2019 (5) TMI 365
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h i/by V.P. Patankar for the Petitioner Mr. M.M. Pable, AGP for the State P.C.: 1. Not on board. Taken on board. 2. Heard learned counsel for final disposal of the petition. 3. The petitioner has challenged an order of assessment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax dated 30.3.2019. By such order, said Authority has imposed sizable tax liability on the petitioner. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....39;s contention of some legal error at the hands of the Assessing Authority, the same would not take care of all disputes of the petitioner. Essentially, therefore, there would be a part of the petitioner's challenge which as a Writ Court, it would not be possible or convenient for us to undertake examination of. 5. While saying so, we realize that the petitioner is threatened with c....
TaxTMI