2015 (2) TMI 1308
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....RDER Sanjay Garg, The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 16.11.2010 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [(hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2003-04 in relation to imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee originally filed its re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....(c) and levied penalty of Rs. 2,98,197/- upon the assessee. 3. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the said penalty. The assessee is, thus, in appeal before us. 4. We have heard the rival contentions of the Ld. Representatives of both the parties and have also gone through the records. The Ld. A.R. of the assessee has stated that in the past such rental income from warehousing premises was treated as b....
TaxTMI