2019 (5) TMI 323

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iff Act, 1985. On scrutiny of the records by the Department, it was noticed that the Appellant during the period April 2006 to June 2009, cleared the Printed and Plain Paper Labels/Tags/Stickers, Folders and Diaries falling under Chapter 48 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, bearing brand name/trade name of others, hence the benefit of SSI exemption Notification No.8/2003-CE, dt.01.03.2003 was not admissible. Consequently, the demand notices were issued from time to time, proposing denial of the benefit of the said notification and recovery of the duty not paid along with interest and penalty. The Adjudicating authority confirmed the demand with interest and penalty. Aggrieved by the said order, they filed appeal before the learned Commiss....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... brand name of others be included in the aggregate value of clearance of all excisable goods during the relevant period so as to determine the eligibility of SSI exemption Notification No.8/2003-CE, dt.01.03.2003, as amended. The claim of the Appellant is that the catch covers are exempted considering it as packing material by virtue of Notification No.24/2009-CE, dt.21.19.2009 issued under Section 11C of Central Excise Act, 1944. We find that this Tribunal has already considered the issue whether the 'catch covers' be called as 'packing material' and fall within the scope of Notification No.24/2009-CE (NT), dt.21.10.2009, in Kajal Print and Packing Pvt. Ltd's case. Following the said judgment subsequently in M/s Beauty Art's case (supra), ....