Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (7) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... --- Only because this court in Federal Bank Ltd. v. CIT [1989] 180 ITR 241, has considered the similar question of law against the Revenue it cannot be said that such question of law arising in a later case ceases to be a referable one. This is the proposition declared by the apex court in D. B. Madan v. CIT [1991] 192 ITR 344 and the said declaration of law would govern the proceedings of the pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r filing fee for enhancing the authorised capital should also carry the same characteristic by reason of addition. It is stated in the petition that with regard to this contention raising the question, the apex court has granted special leave in the matter of J. K. Synthetics Ltd.'s case, as follows : " 20-7-92 : Their Lordships S. Ranganathan, V. Ramaswamy and R. M. Sahai JJ. granted special l....