2019 (4) TMI 1576

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ajesh Kumar ORDER PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT: These two appeals by the Department are directed against the common order dated 7.5.2018 of CIT(A), Panchkula. 2. Since the issue involved is common and appeals were heard together so these are disposed off by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. The common issue involved in both the appeals relates to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... factual position narrated by the Ld. Counsel for the assessee. 6. We have considered the rival submissions and have perused the material available on record. In the present case, it is noticed that the Ld. CIT(A) deleted the impugned additions levied by the Assessing officer u/s 271(1)(c) by observing in para 5 of the impugned order as under:- "5. I have carefully considered argument ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 respectively deleted the additions on the basis of which the Assessing officer levied the impugned penalties u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 8. On a similar issue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K. C. Builders & Others Vs ACIT (2004) 265 ITR 562 has held as under:- "Where the additions made in the assessment order on the basis of which penalty ....