2019 (4) TMI 1555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a/w Mr. J.B. Mishra for the respondent P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. The applicants are the appellants in Central Excise Appeals. 2. By judgment and order dated 21st July, 2014, the appellants' appeals were dismissed by this Court. The appeals preferred before this Court by the applicants under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act were directed against the common interim order dated 26th April, 2013 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal). By the said common interim order dated 26th April, 2013, certain amounts were directed to be deposited by the applicants within the period of eight weeks a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... therefore, the contention that the order did not operate till 18th February, 2018 is completely erroneous. His submission is that this Court showed leniency by extending time to make compliance and after a long lapse of time, now there is no reason to extend the time. 5. The applicants have tendered undertakings on oath which are taken on record in each Notices of Motion and marked "U1" for identification. The applicants have deposited the amounts as per order dated 26th April, 2013 as confirmed by this Court by order dated 21st July, 2014. The applicants have given a clear undertaking (in paragraph 4 of the aforesaid undertakings) to pay the amount as directed to be paid within a period of four weeks along with interest thereon at the ....