Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 1179

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r returns filed by the assessee u/s 153A of the IT Act, 1961?" 2. The Respondent­Assessee was engaged in development of real estate. Assessee was subjected to search in seizure action. During search assessee admitted certain undisclosed income and also filed the return of income pursuant to the search. In the returns the assessee also disclosed the same amount of income, but shifted the year of earning such income as per its method of accounting and also claimed expenditure in relation to such additional receipts. The Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals) objected to such method, upon which the issue eventually reached the tribunal. The tribunal in the impugned judgment ruled in favour of the assessee making following observations; "7.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urred on the on­going projects plus the balance of the profit of projects completed during particular year. The methodology of accounting is not disputed by the Revenue. So however, the dispute relates to assessing of income in relation to such undisclosed receipts of business, which were found in the course of search and were not declared in the regular books of account. Notably, in so far as the nature of such unrecorded receipts is concerned, there is no dispute between the assessee and the Revenue. Both sides agree that the undisclosed receipts found during the course of search are a part and parcel of the business of the assessee of developing real estate properties. In this factual background, in our view, the same methodology oug....