Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 1042

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....alary instead of income from contract of services as held in the assessment order? ii. Without prejudice to the Ground No.i, whether the services rendered after the execution of contract for services would be covered and taxable as Fees for Technical Services u/s 9(1)(vii) read with explanation below sub­section (2) of section 9 of the I.T. Act, 1961? iii. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in Law, the ITAT was justified in deleting the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I T Act, 1961?" 2. These issues arise in the following background. Respondent is sole proprietor of one M/s Radiant Services. Said Radiant Services had entered into an agreement with one M/s Arabi Enertech of Kuwait based c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... source under Section 195 of the Act. 4. The revenue carried the matter in appeal before the Tribunal. Tribunal confirmed the view of the CIT (Appeals) upon which the present appeal has been filed. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused documents on record, we do not find any error in the view of the CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The contract between the assessee and the Kuwait based company was sufficiently clear giving all indications that the concerned person was the employee of the assessee. The preamble to this contract itself provided that as per the contract the assessee would supply Commissioning Engineer to the said company on deputation basis for its on going project. Such deputation would be on....