2019 (4) TMI 586
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....NEET SARAN JUDGMENT S. A. Bobde, J. The Revenue-Appellant has come in appeal against the order of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellant Tribunal (for short "CESTAT") dated 04.04.2007. The Respondent manufactured goods falling under Chapter 72 of The Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Respondent manufactured Pig Iron and HR Coil Sheets. While selling the goods they raised invoices....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peals), confirmed the decision of the Deputy Commissioner and rejected the appeal and held that Dharmada should be added to the assessable value. Therefore, the goods were liable to be assessed on the basis of their price plus Dharmada. The CESTAT in an appeal filed by the Respondent, by judgement dated 04.04.2007, allowed the appeal and set aside the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) date....
TaxTMI