2019 (4) TMI 574

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... weeks from the date of service of copy of petition. 2. Mr. J. Jain, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners states that respondents are served on 26.3.2019. None appeared on behalf of respondents when the matter was called out. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioners presses for ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause(g) restricting the payment of Rs. 3,00,000/- to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited per day till the application for stay filed by the petitioners before the Assessing Officer is disposed of. 4. Petitioners have impugned the notices issued by the Income Tax Officer, under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 thereby attaching various bank accounts of the petitioners' with various banks. The pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent has committed breach of principles laid down by this Court in the said judgment while issuing a notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961 for taking steps of recovery. The appeal filed by the petitioners before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) as well as the application for stay filed before the Assessing Officer is still pending. 6. Statement of learned Counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are required to pay various amounts to Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited towards supply of LPG cylinders and if such amount is not paid, large number of the customers of the petitioners would be seriously affected is accepted. 7. In our prima facie view, there is substance in the submission made by the le....