2019 (4) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iyar and Mr. P. Shirodkar, Advocates for the Petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. B. Khandeparkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. D. Gautam, Inspector (GST) present in person. P.C.: Heard Mr. S.D. Padiyar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1 and 2 and Mr. B. Khandeparkar, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....its and in accordance with law, without going into the issue of limitation; (iii) The amount already recovered by Respondents No.1 and 2 from the Petitioner's Bank Account with the Respondent No.3, shall abide by the final orders that shall be made by the Appellate Authority in the appeal so instituted; (iv) Since the Respondents No. 1 and 2 have already recovered the amount from the Pet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssible and, in any case, within a period of four months from the date of its institution; 4. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the aforesaid agreement is on the basis of instructions from their respective parties, in particular, Mr. D. Gautam, Inspector GST, who is present in the Court. 5. This order is made in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, including, in par....