2019 (4) TMI 485
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s for the Petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. B. Khandeparkar, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. D. Gautam, Inspector (GST) present in person. P.C.: Heard Mr. S.D. Padiyar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1 and 2 and Mr. B. Khandeparkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. Rule....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e issue of limitation; (iii) The amount already recovered by Respondents No.1 and 2 from the Petitioner's Bank Account with the Respondent No.3, shall abide by the final orders that shall be made by the Appellate Authority in the appeal so instituted; (iv) Since the Respondents No. 1 and 2 have already recovered the amount from the Petitioner, the Appellate Authority shall not insist upon an....