Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1996 (7) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal justified in law in finding that the Income-tax Officer did not reject the books of assessee ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, was the Tribunal right in finding that the income of Rs. 1,12,906 determined by the Income-tax Officer in the first instance has only to be taken as the reasonable business income of the assessee for this assessment year ? " The assessee is concerned with the assessment year 1979-80. He conducted five arrack shops and four toddy shops and in regard thereto returned a total income of Rs. 68,350 which is in response to a notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, dated March 25, 1981, the return having been filed on March 9, 1983....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... a strong case for rejecting the accounts filed by the assessee and to estimate the total income. Thereafter in paragraph 11 of the order the officer has taken into consideration that for the subsequent accounting year ending on March 31, 1980, a total income of Rs. 2,43,626 is shown by the assessee after filing to its bankers a profit and loss account in regard thereto. It is observed that this situation is, in spite of the position that whereas in the said year the assessee had only one arrack shop compared to his having five arrack shops during the year under assessment. Noticing this situation, the Income-tax Officer records that on a proper inference the income for the assessment year in question should have been more at least somethin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....owances. This would mean that the Income-tax Officer did not reject the books of account but made certain disallowances of expenses because of the absence of vouchers, etc. Again in the course of the assessment order at paragraph 10, he stated that there is a strong case for rejecting the accounts and estimating the total income. He, therefore, estimated the assessee's business income at Rs. 2,00,000 based upon the profit and loss account of the assessee for the succeeding year filed before its bankers. While arriving at the estimate of Rs. 2,00,000, he has not brought on record any material as to the location of the shop that was bid in the succeeding year and the amount of the kist in the succeeding year for that one shop and the conditio....