Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....H, SC, FOR INCOME TAX For The RESPONDENT : BY SHRI JOSEPH MARKOS (SR. ) JUDGMENT P. R. Ramachandra Menon, J. The point mooted by the Revenue in this appeal filed against the verdict passed by the Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 2001-02 is as to the applicability of Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, providing for interest on excess refund. 2. The crux of the factual matr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the provision could be held only as prospective. It was accordingly, that relief was granted to the Assessee, which made the Revenue to feel aggrieved, who is now before this Court by way of this appeal. 4. Heard the Mr. Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel for the Department as well as Mr. Joseph Markos, the learned Sr. Counsel for the Assessee. 5. It is brought to the no....