Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (4) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....H, SC, FOR INCOME TAX For The RESPONDENT : BY SHRI JOSEPH MARKOS (SR. ) JUDGMENT P. R. Ramachandra Menon, J. The point mooted by the Revenue in this appeal filed against the verdict passed by the Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 2001-02 is as to the applicability of Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, providing for interest on excess refund. 2. The crux of the factual matr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the provision could be held only as prospective. It was accordingly, that relief was granted to the Assessee, which made the Revenue to feel aggrieved, who is now before this Court by way of this appeal. 4. Heard the Mr. Christopher Abraham, the learned Standing Counsel for the Department as well as Mr. Joseph Markos, the learned Sr. Counsel for the Assessee. 5. It is brought to the no....