Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 1535

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d-1, Anand ("the Assessing Officer") in making addition of Rs. 9,87,500/- by disallowing M.O. Commission. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer in rejecting the books of account without pointing out any defects therein and thereby making addition of Rs. 5,39,692/- to the income of the Appellant. 3. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in making addition of Rs. 12,72,990/- on account of cessation of liability by invoking the provisions of section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"). 4. Without prejudice to the above grounds, the learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the actions of Assessing Officer in making addition on account of M.O. Commission and cessation of liability despite the fact that the books of account were held to be unreliable and rejected by the Assessing Officer. 5. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of Assessing Officer in charging interest u/s.234B of the Act. 6. The learned CIT(A) erred in fact and in law in confirming the action of Assessing Officer....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessee despite the fact the turnover of the assessee exceeds the turnover of M/s Shiv & Associates. Thus, it was clear that M/s.Shiv & Associates claimed more expenses to claim from the Income Tax Department. (v) The assessee failed to discharge his onus to prove that the commission expenses were paid to M/s.Shiv Associates in connection with the business. In view of the above, the Assessing Officer disallowed commission expenses of Rs. 9,87,500.00 and added the same to the total income of the assessee. 7. The assessee in the year under consideration has shown gross loss of Rs. 2,06,744/- in respect of its trading business. The details of the gross loss claimed by the assessee are given as under: Sl. No (s) Particulars Amount (in Rs.) 1. Opening Stock NIL 2. Purchases 1,68,54,190/-   Total 1,68,54,190/-   LESS : Sales 1,66,47,446/- 3. Closing stock NIL 4. Gross Loss 2,06,744/- 7.1. The assessee explained that it received the order in advance at a particular rate and at the time of sale the rate came down. Therefore, the loss was incurred on the sale of the goods amounting to Rs. 2,06,744/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t was not shown in the profit and loss account. The ld. CIT-A also confirmed the amount of liability in the name of M/s Hans Ispat Ltd. by observing that these liabilities have ceased to exist. 12. Being aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before us. 13. The Ld.AR before us filed a paper-book running from page 1 to 109 and submitted that no addition could be made in respect of commission expenses and cessation of liability in the event of rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) of the Act. As per the Ld.AR, once the books of accounts got rejected, then a profit on reasonable basis can be estimated for determining the income of the assessee. 14. On the other hand, the Ld.DR submitted that the books of accounts were rejected in respect of its trading business of steel. But the profit declared by the assessee in respect of commission income was duly admitted as per the books of accounts of the assessee. The Ld.DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below. 15. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee in the instant case has declared income from two different sources un....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... rejected only in respect of its steel business. Thus it is implied that the AO did not reject the books of accounts maintained in relation to commission income. 15.7. Thus, the 1st controversy that arises before us for the adjudication whether the books of account can be partially rejected. In this regard, we note that the provisions concerning the rejection of the books of accounts are contained under section 145(3) of the Act which reads as under: "Section 145 (3) Where the Assessing Officer is not satisfied about the correctness or completeness of the accounts of the assessee, or where the method of accounting provided in sub-section (1) [has not been regularly followed by the assessee, or income has not been computed in accordance with the standards notified under sub-section (2)], the Assessing Officer may make an assessment in the manner provided in section 144." 15.8. On perusal of the above provisions, we note that it is nowhere mentioned that the AO can reject the books of accounts partially. It is also an undisputed fact there was a single set of books of accounts maintained by the assessee. We understand that the income shown by the assessee in the instan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....income declaring certain income - Assessing Officer finding number of glaring mistakes, rejected books of account - He, however, made some additions by relying upon same books of account which had been rejected - Tribunal held that Assessing Officer once having rejected books of account, could not have made further additions by relying upon same books and that it would have been better if Assessing Officer had estimated a reasonable profit of assessee considering history and nature of business - Accordingly, Tribunal granted partial relief to assessee - Whether finding recorded by Tribunal being a finding of fact, no substantial question of law arose therefrom - Held, yes [Para 7] [In favour of assessee]" 15.14 . The lower authorities erred in estimating the income only for one source and second source relying on the same set of the books. Once the books of accounts are rejected which was also not challenged by the assessee, then the income needs to be estimated on some reasonable & scientific basis after taking into consideration the past history and the position of the succeding years and other relevant factors. 15.15. As there is no dispute that both the sources of income ....