Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 1419

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... matter of availment of wrong Cenvat Credit by M/s. Magma Industries, Vasai (East). It was observed that the said party had availed Cenvat Credit on the strength of the invoices issued by M/s. Shah Foils Ltd., without receipt and use of the inputs for intended purpose in the factory premises. Accordingly, show cause proceedings were initiated against the M/s. Magma Industries for recovery of wrongly availed Cenvat Credit and for imposition of penalty. Further, show cause proceedings were also initiated against various persons, including the appellant herein for imposition of penalty under Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The matter was adjudicated by order dated 09.12.2016, wherein Cenvat demand was confirmed on Magma Industrie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd further submitted that since the appellant had played active role in fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit, imposition of equal amount of penalty is justified and in conformity with the statutory provisions. She has relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Prakash metal Works vs. Collector of C.Ex., Ahmedabad, 2007 (216) E.L.T. 660 (S.C.) and the judgment of the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Kay Iron Works (Jorian) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C.Ex. Delhi-IV, 2018 (359) E.L.T. 110 (P&H) to state that the benefit of reduced amount of penalty should not be available to the appellant. 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. It is an admitted fact on record that without receipt of the subje....