2019 (3) TMI 1330
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dhar, Member (Technical) And Shri P. Dinesha, Member (Judicial) Shri M. Kannan, Advocate, for the Appellant Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Per P. Dinesha The appellant is a manufacturer of printed materials, had imported printing machines from various suppliers during the impugned period ie., 2008-09 to 2009-10. Such imported machines were installed by the man....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r of the adjudicating authority thereby rejecting the appeal. Aggrieved, the appellant is before this forum. 2. Heard the Ld. Advocate, Shri M. Kannan, appearing for the assessee and Ld. DR, Shri B. Balamurugan, appearing for the Revenue. During the course of hearing, Ld. Advocate submitted interalia that the appellant purchased machinery whereas no separate payment was made towards the install....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he proforma invoices were raised by the supplier including the value of installation and therefore, the fact that the appellant did not pay towards the installation separately, is incorrect. 4.1 We have considered the rival contentions, gone through the documents placed on record, have also gone through the decisions relied on by the Ld. Advocate during the course of the arguments. 4.2 Admit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nvolved in operation of such machines. In such a situation, the sale is held to be complete only when such imported machines are installed. It is not the case of the Revenue that there is separate agreement for providing the service of erection, commissioning or installation and it is not even its case that the main purpose of invoices was for providing the services of installation (erection, comm....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI