Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (11) TMI 1600

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hd. Altaf (Asstt.Commr.) (A.R.) for the Revenue JUDGMENT Mrs.Archana Wadhwa : On matter being called, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant. Accordingly we have heard the learned A.R. for the Revenue and have gone through the impugned order. 2. It is seen that the tax liability stands confirmed against the assessee on the ground that they have provided services of "sale of space o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....018 dated 10.08.2018) as also in the case of CCE, Allahabad v. Nagar Nigam (Final Order No.71126/2018 dated 22.05.2018). 3. Inasmuch as the issue stands decided, we find that the demand of Service Tax on the said count is unsustainable. Accordingly the same is set aside along with setting aside of interest and penalty. 4. Further demand of Service Tax under the category of "renting of immova....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion v. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise [2018 (12) GSTL 62 (Tri.)] has observed that the corporation being a statutory body and having bona fide belief of non-applicability of Service Tax, penalty is not imposable. To the same effect is the Gujarat High Court's decision in the case of Surat Municipal Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs [2017 (50) STR 265 (Guj.)]. In ....