2019 (3) TMI 651

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....1. The petitioner has challenged a notice of reopening of assessment dated 28.3.2018 seeking to reopen the petitioner's assessment for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer had supplied the reasons for reopening the assessment to the petitioner in which it was conveyed that the Assessing Officer had received information from the investigation wing of the department concerning one ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...." Thus, it is seen that M/s. Ankur Power Project Pvt Ltd is one of the beneficiary of accommodation entries from Abhijet Sharma. The amount involved in the transaction is Rs. 3,04,98,000/- for AY 2011- 12." 2. The case of the petitioner is that the reasons proceeded on entirely incorrect factual basis, that the assessee had received a sum of Rs. 3.04 crores on different dates from the said accou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er passed reassessment order on 3.12.2018. The petitioner has, therefore, challenged the very reassessment proceedings as well as the order passed pursuant to such notice. 4. As noted, the case of the petitioner is that the reasons proceeded on erroneous grounds and that such objection was taken in the communication dated 8.10.2018. Learned counsel for the department, however, submitted that no s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the reason that the assessee had raised the ground of the reasons proceeding on incorrect factual premise, but the pointed objection as is elaborated before us now was not taken. If the assessee is correct in contending that the reasons proceeded on entirely erroneous footing and that even going by record, in case of the petitioner, it cannot be stated that the income chargeable to tax had escaped....