Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (4) TMI 25

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the assessee, the Tribunal referred the following question for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 : "1. Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that a sum of Rs. 5,37,359 or part thereof was assessable to tax under section 41(2) of the Income-tax Act ?" The assessee-company was carrying on the bus....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Officer under section 41(2) of the Act for the assessment year 1972-73. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income-tax held that this was a case of compulsory acquisition and hence section 41(2) is clearly applicable. There were appeals both by the assessee and by the Department before the Tribunal. In the assessee's appeal, the first question was whether the sum of Rs. 5,37,359 could be assessed as ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aken over by the Government and the compensation was determined after taking into account each and every item of the assets belonging to the undertaking and, therefore, there was no slump sale so as not to attract the provisions of section 41(2) of the Act. The Tribunal in the case of Raman and Raman Pvt. Ltd. followed the Special Bench order of the Tribunal in the case of Southern Roadways (P.) L....