Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 331

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee company was not legal owner of the property which lease rental income were shown in its accounts. 2. (a) The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and not tenable in law and on facts. (b) The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any/all of the grounds of appeal before or during the course of the hearing of the appeal." ITA No. 6414/Del/2015(Revenue's appeal) AY: 2011-12 1. That the Ld.CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 12,18,10,152/- on protective basis, made on account of lease rental income ignoring the fact that the assessee company was not legal owner of the property which lease rental income were shown in its accounts. 2. (a) The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and not tenable in law and on facts. (b) The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any/all of the grounds of appeal before or during the course of the hearing of the appeal." ITA No. 6767/Del/2015 (Assessee's appeal) AY: 2010-11 " On the facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT (A) has erred:- 1. In not accepting the lease rentals received from retail spaces of Am....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ADIPL) under an agreement against the advance of interest free deposit of Rs. 75 crores from ADIPL. 2. In not taking judicial notice of the fact that the appellant company had by an agreement given to ADIPL unfettered rights to let-out and manage its retail spaces and to receive and appropriate to its own account all receipts and receivables from the leasing of its retail spaces in lieu of interest free deposit of Rs. 75 crores received from it, which it needed for completion of its Hotel Project. 3. In not recognizing that section 60 is not applicable, if the income is derived not from transfer of assets but by reason of the right to manage and carry on business. 4. In ignoring the legal effect of the agreement entered into by the company with ADIPL in the ordinary course of business giving it right to manage its assets and carry on the business of leasing. The agreement is bona fide and unambiguous and creates certain legal rights and obligations which have been acted upon. 5. In disregarding the terms and conditions of the said agreement which gave right to ADIPL to exploit its assets against a co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of property to assessee has taken place. Ld.AO thus reduced sum of Rs. 10,88,44,182/- from assessee's income and assessed the same in hands of assessee on protective basis, whereas, substantive addition was made in the hands of M/s.Ambience Hotels and Resorts Pvt.Ltd. He further denied standard deduction of 30% amounting to Rs.32,673,254/-claimed by assessee in its returned income. 3. Aggrieved by addition made by Ld.AO assessee preferred appeal before Ld.CIT (A), observed that the lease rentals cannot be assessed under head, 'Income from House Property', as assessee is not legal owner, and it can be assessed under head, 'Income from Business or Profession', as assessee is in business of leasing of properties. Ld.CIT(A) held that business expenses incurred thereto by assessee were required to be allowed from said lease income, as these expenses were added back to assessee to its income. 4. Aggrieved by order of Ld.CIT (A) revenue is in appeal before us now. 5. Ld.CIT DR placed reliance upon order of Ld.AO. He submitted that arrangement has been entered into by assessee with its sister concern, wherein right to receive rental income from retail shop and retail spaces have....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... receivables from the leasing of Said Space or any part thereof. 2. That the aforesaid sum of Rs. 75,00,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Crores Only) has been paid by the Second Party to the First Party (the receipt whereof the First Party hereby admits and acknowledges) as an interest-free refundable deposit The First Party may refund the said interest-free deposit by giving a one year notice in writing, at any time after the initial period of three years. However, the tenure of this agreement shall not exceed 10 years and First Party shall refund the said refundable security deposit to the Second Party and simultaneously the Second Party shall surrender its rights for sub-letting and managing the Said Space to the First Party. 3. That this agreement shall be deemed to be effective from the date of this Agreement or the date of the Agreement for Taking Possession for Fit Out(s) entered into with tenants/occupants of the various retail spaces comprising the Said Space or any part thereof by the First Party, whichever is earlier. 4. That the Second Party shall be entitled to receive the monthly rent or other charges/including the arrears of rent / charges if ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rty". 27. " Owner of house property"," annual charge", etc., defined For the purposes of sections 22 to 26 (i) an individual who transfers otherwise than' for adequate consideration any house property to his or her spouse, not being a transfer in connection with an agreement to live apart, or to a minor child not being a married daughter, shall be deemed to be the owner of the house property so transferred; (ii) the holder of an impartable estate shall be deemed to be the individual owner of all the properties comprised in the estate; (iii) a member of a co- operative society, company or other association of persons to whom a building or part thereof is allotted or leased under a house building scheme of the society, company or association, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be the owner of that building or part thereof; (iiia) a person who is allowed to' take or retain possession of any building or part thereof in part performance of a contract of the nature referred to in section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 2 (4 of 1882 ), shall be deemed to be the owner of that building or part thereof; (iiib) a pers....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see has challenged taxation of income from leasing of shops/retail spaces in its hands for the year under consideration and the disallowance computed by Ld.AO under section 14 A read with rule 8D (2) (iii) of the Act amounting to Rs.5,56,000/- 12.1. Ground No. 1-5 Issue raised by assessee in these grounds are regarding taxability of lease rentals arising out of retail shops and retail spaces owned by assessee. 12.2. Facts herein are similar to that reproduced herein above. There is rental income from retail spaces and retail shops owned by assessee, which was collected by M/s.Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., by virtue of agreement dated 31/03/2008.Assessee has raised a plea that, Section 60 is not applicable to facts of case before us. 12.3. Admittedly, facts involved in this case are identical to that of appeals considered hereinabove. Both parties have referred to and relied upon same arguments, that has been advanced hereinabove. 13. We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in the light of the records placed before us. 13.1. We have already taken a view in aforestated appeals regarding taxability of rental income received from leased p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be assessed in the hands of the transferee is, under section 60 of the 1961 Act, to be assessed in the hands of the transferor under all circumstances. Object of enactment.-Section 60 is merely declaratory of a principle which is well settled under the income-tax law, namely, that profits on their coming into existence attract tax at that point and that the revenue is not concerned with the subsequent application of the profits. If a person has alienated or assigned the source of his income, he would not be liable to be taxed upon the income arising from that source thereafter unless some statutory provisions, such as those contained in section 60 to 64, are attracted. Leaving out such cases and those where the income is diverted along with the source producing it, the mere fact that the recipient is constrained to apply it in a particular manner either under a statute or under certain contracts would not affect assessee's liability to tax. This is often expressed by saying that application or destination of profits or a charge which has been made upon them by previous agreement or otherwise is immaterial for the purpose of taxation. The above princi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions of Hon'ble Supreme Court and Hon'ble High Court's, wherein, relation of property from which income arises has been considered to be an essential condition for applicability of section 60. 13.4. We are therefore unable to concur with argument advanced by Ld.AR for taxing rental income received from leased premises in the hands of M/s.Ambience Developers and Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., when such assets are owned and held by assessee. The exception argued by Ld.AR is no longer available to assessee, by virtue of strict interpretation of section 60-63 of the Act. 13.5. We are therefore inclined to uphold view of Ld.CIT (A) that income from leasing of shops/retail spaces has to be assessed in the hands of assessee under the head, 'Income from House Property', after allowing statutory deductions under section 24 of the Act. 13.6. Accordingly ground No. 1-5 stands dismissed. 14. Ground No. 6 Ld.AO observed that, assessee made investment of Rs. 21,54,72,937/-, in shares during year under consideration. Keeping in view investment made, Ld.AO computed 0.5% of average investment and computed disallowance under section 14 A of the Act, read with Rule 8D, to the extent of Rs....