Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,455/- on account of difference in cost of acquisition of the asset as on 01.04.1981 relying upon the report of DVO. 2. The facts in brief are that assessee is an individual who had sold property for a sale consideration of Rs. 16.35 crores during the year under consideration and has consequentially declared Long Term Capital Gain and claimed deduction u/s.54. The property under consideration was situated at 67, Paschim Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi which belonged to Smt. Vidhya Wati Pandit, who vide her will dated 03.01.1992 bequeathed her entire one half undivided share in the said property equally in favour of her two heirs, namely, Shri Priya Ranjan Pandit and Shri Shiv Ranjan Pandit. The assessee's share in the said property came to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sideration all the objections of the assessee, however he sent the entire submission of the assessee to the Assessing Officer to send his remand report and also directed the Assessing Officer to call for the comments of the DVO. Accordingly, Assessing Officer has submitted the remand report vide letter dated 08.08.2017 after calling for the comments of the DVO with respect to objections raised by the assessee. The comment of the DVO reads as under: "3. In absence of the referred valuation reports, no comments can be offered. It ma however be said that Safdarjung Area was much more developed than Vasant Vihar during 1981. Hence valuation of a Vasant Vihar property can only be done on considering the land rate lower than the land rat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the valuation report dated 18.12.2016, DDA's auction rates of 1981 of Safdarjung area have been reduced by mere 10%. There is no denying the fagtrihat Safdarjung area was much more developed than Vasant Vihar during 1981." 5. Ld. Assessing Officer in his remand report had also distinguished the judgment relied upon by the assessee especially in the case of CIT vs. Raman Kumar Suri and Raj Kumar Khosla vs. ITO of Hon'ble Bombay High Court wherein it was held that prescribed rate in Nabhi's guide cannot be substituted for the valuation of the property in Delhi done by approved valuer. 6. Ld. CIT(A) had rejected both the valuation report of approved valuer by the assessee and sustained the valuation report of the DVO and according....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te of Rs. 5000/- per sq mtr for a property located at Provi Marg.   8. On the other hand, learned Department Representative has strongly relied upon the order of the Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A) and submitted that all the objections of the assessee has been taken note of by the DVO and thus report of the DVO is far more acceptable. 9. After considering the rival submissions and on perusal of the relevant findings given in the impugned orders, we find that Assessing Officer has recomputed the Long Term Capital Gain at Rs. 10,84,67,878/- as against Rs. 10,00,87,423/- shown by the assessee. The difference amount of Rs. 83,80,455/- has been added solely on the valuation of the property as on 01.04.1981, as the assessee had sho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i's guide to the house tax cannot be substituted for the valuation at New Delhi property done by the valuer for the purpose of valuation of the property. Further Court has held that empanelled registered valuer of the Income Tax Department and the valuation done by such Registered Valuer would take precedent over Nabhi's guide to house tax which is generalized guide and does not take into account the peculiar features of the property being valued. Similarly, here in this case, also entire basis of the DVO is based on the value given in the Nabhi's guide and thereafter, he has made certain adjustment which cannot be said to be a proper factor. Nabhi's rates are nothing but merely compilation of DDA's auction rate based on reasonable estim....