Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (10) TMI 60

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....laint Case No. 294 of 1992, taking cognizance under sections 276C and 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), against the petitioners. The complainant-opposite party filed a petition of complaint alleging, inter alia, that the original assessment of the firm was made under section 143(1) of the Act on a total income of Rs. 15,310 on October 15, 1986. Thereafter, a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xpenses were shown as Rs. 8,574 during the said period. Further, advance of Rs. 9,650 was also made to different parties. Rs. 10, 846 was estimated as interest on these advances. The records further showed that the firm has earned interest during the relevant period but did not show it in the relevant documents. Thus, it was alleged that the accused persons wilfully did not file the return in resp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issible in law. The case was lodged against the firm, M/s Ganesh Steel Traders, and three partners, namely, Lakhan Lal Sao, Ashok Kumar and Ajay Kumar. This petition has been filed on behalf of the firm and Lakhan Lal Sao. Now, the law is well-settled that in the case of the prosecution under the Act with regard to offence alleged to have been committed by the firm or company there should be spec....