Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (3) TMI 108

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ucts would be correctly classifiable under 4820 of CETA, 1985. However, the appellants were clearing all these impugned goods under the premise that they would fall under SSI exemption under Notification 8/2003-CX. Pursuant to investigation, show cause notice was issued to the appellant inter alia proposing to demand duty of Rs. 14,04,409/- with interest in respect of clearances made from 1.4.2006 to 31.3.2008 and for imposing penalties under various provisions of law. In adjudication, the original authority vide order dated 31.5.2010 confirmed the duty liability as proposed in the show cause notice and also imposed equal penalty under section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Rs. 10,000/- under Rule 25. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowing decisions:- a. Dy. Chief Manager (P&S) Central Railway Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai - I - 2015 (328) ELT 296 b. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur Vs. Shree Datawares Pvt. Ltd. - 2017 (349) ELT 499 c. B.K. Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay - 1998 (101) ELT 407 d. Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Chidambaram Litho Press - 2009 (247) ELT 690. 3. On the other hand, ld. AR Supports the impugned order. She submitted that as per law, the product would fall under 4820 of CETA and not under 4911. 4. Heard both sides. 5. We find that the ld. consultant is correct in his assertion that the classification of the impugned goods has been settled by case laws cited by him,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d turnover of goods falling under 48         Less: C.M. Cell Intimation card - Ch.48.17 306505   152791   Hyundai Motors cut sheet - printed cut sheet   956859 1595549   Security Job - High Court judgment sheet - Cut sheet 234453   0   Jewel loan form - printed cut sheet 0   48950   TMA forms - thermal paper cut to size (for ATM) 529544       Conductor cash receipt / trip sheet - printed cut sheet 0   2373331   Pothy's cash token - printed cut sheet 506835   341835   O.P. slip - printed cut sheet 34340   172308 &....