Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 1275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 'A' Bench, Chennai (hereinafter called the Tribunal) in the stay petitions filed by the assessee in S.P.Nos.393 to 399/Chny/2018 in ITA.Nos. 2841 to 2847/Chny/2018 for the assessment years from 2009-10 to 2015- 16. 2. The assessee filed petitions before the Tribunal praying for stay of the outstanding demand of Rs. 9,33,16,430/-. The Tribunal, by the impugned common order, after taking note of the hardship faced by the assessee on account of attachment of the bank accounts, granted stay of the demand subject to payment of instalment of Rs. 50 lakhs payable on or before 30th/ 31st of every English calendar month and the first instalment should be paid on or before 31.12.2018. Being aggrieved by the said condition, the assessee is b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng with return of income wherein the assessee adopted accretion of net asset method for the purpose of computing the taxable income as the books of accounts were not properly maintained earlier to the search operations. Further, the assessee would contend that the other documents, which were produced by the assessee, were not considered by the CIT(A). So far as the prayer for stay is concerned, the assessee contended that on account of various factors, his business operations were very much affected, that the bank account was also frozen and that consequently, he was unable to carry on business. 8. On a perusal of the common impugned order, we find that the Tribunal accepted the assessee's case that he is facing hardship on account of....