Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1996 (9) TMI 20

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this court had an occasion, relying on the Full Bench decision of this court, in Narayanan and Co. v. CIT [1997] 223 ITR 209 (Ker) [FB]; [1996] KLJ (Tax Cases) 154, to follow to answer identical questions in I. T. R. No. 42 of 1993. The said identical questions are as follows : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and where a partner obtains a licence and carries on th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Bench decision of this court Narayanan and Co. v. CIT [1997] 223 ITR 209; [1996] KLJ (Tax Cases) 154 has decided that such a contract of partnership is void under section 23 of the Contract Act and as such cannot be recognised as a genuine partnership firm with reference to the proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the process of reasoning it is observed, that the said partnership is agai....