2016 (12) TMI 1765
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal has been filed by the Assessee against the order dated 28.3.2014 of the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut relating to assessment year 2009- 10. 2. The grounds raised by the assessee read as under:- 1. That on the last two date of hearing on 18.3.2014 and 28.3.2014, adjournment was sought because of unavailability of the counsel due to death of his father....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... not disputed by both the parties, hence, the same are not repeated here for the sake of convenience. 4. Ld. Counsel of the assessee stated that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed the order against the principles of natural justice by way of exparte order in not providing sufficient opportunities to the assessee. 5. On the other hand, Ld. DR relied upon the orders of the authorities below. 6. We h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lication was filed. 18.3.2013 28.3.2013 Appellant once again filed. 3. From the above it is evident that more than sufficient opportunities of being heard have been allowed to the appellant. On the several dates fixed for hearing, the appellant filed adjournment application and the case was adjourned. On these dates, either none attended or adjournment application was filed. This....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI