Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (10) TMI 702

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None appears for the Respondent though served. The aforesaid Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- (i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal flawed in approving the reassessment notice dated 02.05.2002 issued under Section 148 read with Section 147 of the Act? (ii....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lding that there exist an employer and employee relationship between PUSA and the Appellant and therefore, the benefit accruing from the stock options is assessable as perquisites defined under Section 17(2) (iii) of the Act? (v) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal misdirected itself in holding that decision of the Apex Court in CIT v. INFOSY....