Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order dated 4th March, 2015 is in respect of Assessment Years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07. Thus, four appeals. 2. The Revenue urges the following common identical question of law in all the appeals for our consideration:   "Whether in law and on the facts & circumstances of this case, was the Tribunal was justified in upholding the deletion made by the CIT(A) to determine the Income from house property ignoring the order of the Addl. Rent Tribunal ?" 3. We refer to the facts from Income Tax Appeal No.512 of 2016 relating to Assessment Year 2003-04. This as it is agreed position between the parties that except differences in dates and amounts, the facts and law applicable to all the four Assessment Years in appeal are ident....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al income at Rs. 4.29 Crores (against declared rental income of Rs. 2.70 lakhs) by Assessment Order dated 31st December, 2010 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Act. 5. Being aggrieved, the Respondent preferred an Appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. By the order dated 8th July, 2011 relating to Assessment Years 2003-04 allowed the Respondent's appeal. This, by inter alia, holding that the dispute before the Rent Control Tribunal was in respect of one of the properties which had been trespassed by M/s. Bank of Punjab Ltd., and the compensation/ mesne profit/ damages granted in respect thereof (L40) could not be compared to the rent received in respect of all other shops/premises from protec....