2019 (2) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce dt. 30/03/1985 to function as a 100% EOU for the manufacture of the goods and export of polished granite slabs. The appellant procured certain duty-free capital goods and installed the same in their EOU premises for the manufacture of goods and during the period 1986 to 1993 goods worth Rs. 298.54 lakhs were exported but from 1993 onwards, the procurement of granite blocks from the quarries became difficult owing to adverse law and order situation as a result of which the appellant were compelled to halt the production resulting in short-fall of the export obligation as stipulated in the letter of permission. Thereafter, the Development Commissioner, Cochin SEZ vide order dt. 19/07/2002 ordered for de-bonding of the appellants' EOU. How....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....contrary to the binding judicial precedent. He also submitted that the conclusion arrived by the Commissioner(Appeals) is not correct because it is a settled legal position that a unit would remain a EOU till payment of duties on the warehoused goods and the issuance of the final exit order by the Development Commissioner. He also submitted that in the present case, ex-bond Bills of Entry were presented only on 14/03/2008 and duty was paid thereafter and as per the Board's circular No.14/2004-Cus dt. 13/02/2004, the appellants are entitled to refund till the payment of duty. He further submitted that this issue is no more res integra and has been settled in the following cases wherein it has been consistently held that depreciation shall be....