Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 586

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of appeals are given below:- Appeal No. Period Amount involved ST/20329/2018 April 2013 to March 2015 Rs.18,48,613/- ST/21221/2018 April 2015 to June 2017 Rs.25,25,815/- For the sake of convenience, the facts of appeal No.ST/20329/2018 are taken for discussion. 2. Briefly the facts of the present case are that the appellants are holders of service tax registration for provision of 'Business Support Service, Business Auxiliary Service, Management or Business Consultant Service, Renting of Immovable Property Service etc.". They are availing CENVAT credit facility under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. During the course of audit of their records for the period April 2013 to March 2015, it was observed that the appellant has collecte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egular and hence credit availed appeared to be ineligible. The total ineligible credit availed by the appellant worked out to Rs. 18,48,613/- as per details / records submitted by them vide their letter dt. 20/05/2016. On these allegations, a show-cause dt. 03/06/2016 was issued to the appellant proposing to recover ineligible cenvat credit of Rs. 18,48,613/- availed and utilized for the period April 2013 to March 2015 along with interest and penalty. After following the due process, the original authority vide order dt.31/03/2017 confirmed the demand along with interest and also imposed penalty of Rs. 9,24,307/-. Aggrieved by the said order, appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner(Appeals) who rejected the said appeal. 3. Heard bot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rvices procured by the appellant such as software licence, security charges, services for salary purposes, training expenses, consultant fee and other such services which is received by the appellant for group of company as a whole and on the basis of usage of service, the cost related to such usage is recovered by way of debit note along with service tax and the said taxes are remitted under Business Support Services. It is his further submission that the CENVAT credit availed is not on the basis of debit note issued to its sister concern / group company, instead it is on the basis of valid invoice issued by respective service provider. But both the authorities below have failed to understand the said facts and treated CENVAT credit availe....