AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (2) TMI 413
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. Mahesh Raichandani with Ms. Pragya Koolwal i/b UBR Legal for the Respondent. P.C. : 1 This Appeal of the Revenue challenges the order passed by the Central Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Mumbai dated 13th May, 2015, in Appeal No.ST/396/10. This Appeal arose out of an order passed on 7th June, 2010, by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. 2. The Reve....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Tribunal's order by urging that as far as the main issue is concerned, the Revenue has succeeded. The cenvat credit was ineligible. However, the Tribunal, on taking an overall view of the matter, did not sustain the penalties, but set aside the same. It also did not sustain the demand fully but partially. In such circumstances and when there was an issue of interpretation that the Tribunal found ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....notice or that partially the same is within limitation and the rest of it cannot be sustained. Thus, the issue of limitation has been dealt with. Finally, the Tribunal also found that because the issue was of interpretation and arguable, the penalties cannot be sustained. They also cannot be sustained because the demand has not been upheld in full. It is on such an overall consideration that it fo....