2018 (4) TMI 1639
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. Anuroop Singhi For Respondent(s) : Mr. L. Badrinarayana with Mr. Sameer Jain Order .1 In view of the judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Service Tax V. Ernest & Young Private Limited (supra) wherein it has been held as under:- "Before we examine other judgments, it is important to examine the language of Section 35G in the bracketed portion which rela....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gs" in Section 35G of the CE Act in the case of Bharti Airtel Limited 2013(30) STR 451 (Del), a Division Bench of this Court has stated: "3. On a plain reading of Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 it is clear that no appeal would lie to the High Court from an order passed by CESTAT if such an order relates to among other things, the determination of any question having a relatio....
TaxTMI