TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2019 (2) TMI 79
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... M.N. Bharathi, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench Brief facts are that the respondents are engaged in manufacture of filtration equipment falling under CETSH 84212190 of CETA, 1985. On scrutiny of records for the months of December 2007 to May 2008, it was found that they had cleared filtration equipment without payment of duty claiming exemption under Sl. No. 91of Notification No.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in observed that the respondents are eligible for exemption of the notification and set aside the demand, interest and penalties. Aggrieved, the department has come in appeal. 2. On behalf of the department, ld. AR Shri L. Nandakumar supported the grounds of appeal. 3. The ld. counsel Shri M.N. Bharathi appeared for the respondent and submitted that though the respondents are not the participant....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....niwal Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur - 2017 (5) GSTL 179. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The respondents have supplied the goods for water treatment plant for human consumption and the only ground for disallowing the benefit of Notification 6/2006 is that the respondents who is a sub-contractor has not participated in the International Competitive Bidding. It is not dis....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in fact supplied to such power project and the equipments were installed at the project site. What we noticed is that neither the benefits under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. (Sr. No. 400) nor the exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. (Sr. No. 91) is subject to any conditions stipulated in Foreign Trade Policy. BHEL as the main contractor could have imported the impugned goods without payme....