Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (2) TMI 6

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....course of scrutiny of records of appellant, it was found that between 01.09.2012 to 31.07.2013, the appellant had availed CENVAT credit to the tune of Rs. 9,51,515/- against purchase of those items allegedly used for utility services needed for operation of machines for production, but in response to show-cause notice dated 03.10.2013 proposing duty demand for such allegedly wrong availment of credits, the appellant had consistently pleaded before the Revenue as well as Adjudicating Authority that those H.R. Plates were used to store acid in regeneration tank, protect inner part of the furnace, during galvanisation as well as repair and maintenance of re-coiler sliding base, while M.S. Plates were used to patch up worn out machines and for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arana SSK Ltd. Vs. CCE, Kolhapur - 2018-TIOL-883-CESTAT-MUM, Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd. Vs. CCE, Mumbai-II and Jai Mahesh Sugar Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE, Aurangabad - Order No. A/89516/17/SMB dated 12.09.2017, he argued that supporting structures are not component of capital goods as held in the case of Saraswati Sugar Mills Vs. CCE, Delhi-III reported in 2011 (270) ELT 465 (SC) as they are not essential requirements in a manufacturing unit and therefore, reasoning and rationality found in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) needs no interference. 5. Heard from both the sides at length and perused the case records as well as development of law in the field through judicial pronouncements, as referred by the adversaries. As per repor....