Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (11) TMI 121

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of inspection fees. The assessee was having arrangement with certain parties who were provisionally qualified for the purpose of inspection of goods meant for export. The submission of the assessee was that under section 35B(1)(b)(ix) it was provided that weighted deduction was allowable on such export promotional activities as may be prescribed. Rules were framed and made effective from August 1, 1981, prescribing such activities. Inasmuch as the assessment proceedings had not yet achieved the finality as the appeal was pending before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal when the rules came into force, the benefit of the rules was available to the assessee. It was also submitted that once the rule was framed the benefit thereof would be available to the assessee by reference to the date by which the main provision in the statute itself had existed. On behalf of the Revenue, it was submitted that rule 6AA came into force with effect from August 1, 1981 and, therefore, the assessee could not claim weighted deduction by relying on the rule for a period anterior to August 1, 1981, and retroactively extendin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessee) referred to in clause (b), he shall, subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed a deduction of a sum equal to one and one-third times the amount of such expenditure incurred during the previous year : Provided that in respect of the expenditure incurred after the 28th day of February, 1973, by a domestic company, being a company in which the public are substantially interested, the provisions of this clause shall have effect as if for the words 'one and one-third times', the words 'one and one-half times' had been substituted. (b) The expenditure referred to in clause (a) is that incurred wholly and exclusively on---... (vi) furnishing to a person outside India samples or technical information for the promotion of the sale of such goods, services or facilities;... (ix) such other activities for the promotion of the sale outside India of such goods, services or facilities as may be prescribed." The provision has undergone changes from time to time. For our purposes it would suffice to note that section 35B was introduced into the body of the main Act by the Finance Act, 1968, with effect from April 1, 1968. The words "before the first day of Marc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n our mind that it cannot have applicability to any claim arising before the date of enactment of the rule. Parliament when it enacted sub-clause (ix) chose not to describe or specify the nature or character of the goods, services or facilities as would be covered by the said provision. The power was delegated to the rule-making authority. Parliament knew that the benefit of the provision would not be available to the claimant unless and until the description or nature and character of such goods, services or facilities was prescribed. The delegated power of legislation was not exercised until August 1, 1981. If the rule-making authority intended to confer the benefit thereof from a back date it would have said so specifically but it did not. It was not disputed at the Bar that rule 6AA has not been expressly given a retrospective operation. In CWT v. Sharvan Kumar Swarup and Sons [1994] 210 ITR 886 (SC), the following passage from Salmond on Jurisprudence has been quoted with approval : "The law of procedure may be defined as that branch of the law which governs the process of litigation. It is the law of actions---jusquod ad actiones pertinent---using the term action in a w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er, the law is well settled that where the language is plain, it can neither be stretched wider nor squeezed narrowly with an eye on assumed or implied intention of the Legislature. In a fiscal law much scope for interpretative process is not available if the language of an enactment permits of no ambiguity. Parliament having specifically enumerated the categories of the expenditure entitled to weighted deduction by cataloguing the same as sub-clauses (i) to (viii) of clause (b), inserted a residuary entry by enacting sub-clause (ix). Sub-clause (ix) does not define any class by itself. It has been left to be prescribed subject to an overriding consideration that the activities to be prescribed in exercise of delegated legislative power must result in promotion of the sale outside India of goods, services or facilities. Sub-clause (ix) as enacted is a piece of conditional and delegated legislation both. Parliament having laid down the broad feature of "other activities", have left them to be enumerated by the executive. However, the availability of benefit under sub-clause (ix) is dependent on or conditioned by the same being prescribed. Unless the activities are prescribed i....