2019 (1) TMI 923
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....onstitution of India with following prayers: "(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or prohibition in the nature of mandamus or prohibition inter alia quashing the impugned order dt. 29.03.2018 and corrigendum dt. 28.06.2018 (Annexure D ad D-1 hereto); (b) Direct the Respondents no. 2 & 4 not to enforce the impugned order dt. 29.03.2018 and the corrigendum dt. 28.06.2018 (Annexure D and D-1 hereto); (c) Give Interim/Ad-interim relief I terms of prayer a & b above. (d) For such further and other relief as the Hon'ble Court may deem it necessary in the interest of justice." 4. Thus what is essentially under challenge is the order-inoriginal dated 29.03.2018 on the ground that the competent concerned a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....that this notification so far as the showcause- notice dated 28.3.2008 in question of the petitioner is concerned, was of no consequence as the said show-causenotice was in fact culminated into order-in-original and was in fact the subject matter of appeal before the competent tribunal. However the concerned respondent undertook a task of adjudicating the same as the petitioner had changed the address and he was out of business, he did mention his new business in the declaration in the appeal proceedings which ordinarily would have been known to the concerned authority. However the three notices which had never been received by the petitioner as it was sent to the old address of the petitioner which the petitioner did not know about the adj....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI