Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 332

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s Jagriti Ahuja and Mr Amol Sharma, Advocates, Mr Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank/, Mr Santosh Kumar Rout, Advocate or BOB and BOI, Mr Niraj Kumar, Advocate for Oriental Bank of Commerce And Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI ORDER ORDER VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:- "A. An appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus inter-alia directing the Respondent Banks to consider and accept the resolution plan and options put forth by the Petitioner Company for repayment of the total debt owned by the Petitioner Company; B. An appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus inter-alia directing the respondent banks to provide necessary guidelines and/or resolution....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bmitted that in terms of the aforesaid circular, the JLF was required to consider various options for a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) but the respondent banks have failed to arrive at an appropriate CAP for revival of the petitioner's business, in order to enable the petitioner to discharge the debts owed to the respondent banks. 7. Mr Karan Khanna, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 (Canara Bank) countered the aforesaid submissions. He submitted that the JLF had examined the proposals submitted by the petitioner and had rejected the same. He further stated that the bankers had also lost their confidence in the management of the petitioner company. He submitted that although the petitioner claims that it has stocks in excess of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es is unable to build confidence and not convincing Nothing new has been added. Sufficient time has been given to the company to present concrete action plan but company has failed to do so. Company's progress on compliance matters/ operationalization is very poor Looking all the aspects, JLF has decided to initiate recovery steps/filing the case with NCLT." 11. Similarly, the Minutes of the JLF Meeting held on 15.05.2018 indicate that the respondents had unanimously decided as under:- * "Company has been always assuring but fails to comply pending matters. Reasons quoted by the company are repetitive and far from convincing * Since account is already marked as RFA so proposal for OTS/restruct....