Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 224

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....17 for the assessment year 2012-13. 2. The above appeal is filed by raising the following substantial questions of law : "i. Whether the Tribunal was right in law in not adjudicating the main grounds of appeal raised regarding deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer of provision of outstanding of Rs. 16,77,14,178/- ? And ii. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal ought to have appreciated that the provision of Rs. 16,77,14,176/- was merely outstanding balance of provision originally made as on 31.3.2009 carried forward in the balance sheet from year to year and as it was neither debited in profit and loss account during the assessment year 2012-13 nor claimed as a deduction a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vision made for Rs. 25,66,33,427/-. Thus, the provision got reduced to Rs. 16,77,14,178/- as on 31.3.2012. 5. For the assessment year under consideration in this appeal namely 2012-13, the assessee filed the return of income on 27.9.2012 declaring loss of Rs. 12,92,62,977/-. The assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 27.3.2015 determining the total income at Rs. 18,40,27,900/-. The Assessing Officer, while completing the assessment, made an addition of Rs. 16,77,14,178/- being the balance sheet item, which was not claimed in the profit and loss account of the assessment year 2012-13 subsequent to disallowance of such provision of Rs. 25.66 Crores in the assessment year 2009-10. During the course of the assessment,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Rs. 25.66 Crores in the assessment year 2009-10 as the appeals before the Tribunal in ITA.Nos.1159 and 1160/Mds/2017 were pending at the relevant time and orders were passed thereon only on 24.1.2018, much after the order impugned before us. 7. In the said order passed by the Tribunal dated 24.1.2018, there was a direction to the Assessing Officer to allow the entire provisions towards the enhanced compensation debited in the profit and loss account for the assessment year 2009-10 to the tune of Rs. 25.66 Crores based on the fact that the enhanced compensation accrued and accordingly, the assessee provided for the same. In the background of these facts, the assessee has preferred this appeal challenging the order dated 12.7.2017 passe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed that the CIT(A) ought to have appreciated that as the entire provisions of Rs. 25.66 Crores made during the financial year 2008-09 were disallowed, the amount actually paid during the year to the tune of Rs. 3.52 Crores and adjusted against the provision should be allowed as a deduction. 11. The second contention raised before the Tribunal was an alternate submission and what was the substantive submission was that the balance sheet item of Rs. 16.77 Crores was never claimed as a deduction by the assessee. 12. Unfortunately, the Tribunal, while passing the impugned order, though noted the said argument of the assessee in paragraph 9.2, failed to take into consideration the said amount. Therefore, in our considered view, the assesse....