2010 (11) TMI 1083

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....N. Seetharaman ORDER Dr. O.K. Narayanan,   This appeal is filed by the Revenue. The assessment year is 2003-04. The appeal is directed against the order of the C.I.T.(Appeals)-III at Chennai dated 30.9.2009 and arises out of assessment completed under sec.143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2. The grounds raised by the Revenue in this appeal read as follows : "2.1 The learned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....icer 's observation in the assessment order that even as per the BIFR order, advance of Rs. 100 lakhs was to be provided as interest free loans while the assessee has advanced more than Rs. 10 crores as loan to the subsidiary company and has not chosen to charge interest on the entire sum. 2.5 The learned CIT(A) failed to consider the point that the subsidiary company recorded a profit of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ought to have seen that on the facts of the case the advance given by the assessee did not have the element of commercial expediency. 'We wish to make it clear that it is not our opinion that in every case interest on borrowed loan has to be allowed if the assessee advances it to a sister concern. It all depends on the facts and circumstances of the respective case.'" 3. We heard Shri....