Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (1) TMI 74

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate ORDER RAJESH BINDAL J. Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, the Tribunal) dated 05.04.2017 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner on account of failure to deposit the amount required for entertainment of appeal, has been impugned by filing the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is en....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondents submitted that any assessee is required to deposit 7.5% of the amount of demand raised, which the petitioner failed to deposit, hence, appeal has rightly been dismissed on failure to comply with the pre-requisite condition of deposit. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in our view, admittedly, out of the demand of Rs. 13,86,31,711/-, a sum of Rs. 6,79,35,479/- had been deposi....