2019 (1) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in law. ii. Without prejudice to the above, the A.O. on the basis of information without any independent enquiry himself started reassessment proceedings and therefore reassessment proceedings and therefore reassessment proceedings are arbitrary, unjust and bad in law. 2. As regards confirmation of addition of Rs. 11,00,000/- i. Without prejudice to the above, the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 11,00,000/- without properly appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case, details and documents on record, evidences produced and case laws cited during the course of appeal proceedings, which is arbitrary unjust and bad in law. ii. Without prejudice to the above, the confirmation of aforesaid addition on the basis o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... contended that this act of the A.O. is contrary to the judicial pronouncements. Ld. Counsel has relied upon the following case laws: 1. CIT Vs. Kamdhenu Steel & Alloys (2012) 248 CTR 33 (Delhi)(High Court) 2. CIT Vs. Multiplex Trading & Industrial Co. Ltd. (2015) 128 DTR 217 (Delhi)(HC) 3. Pr. CIT Vs. G. Pharma India Ltd. (2017) 384 ITR 147 (Delhi) (HC) 4. CIT Vs. Insecticides (India) Ltd. (2013) 357 ITR 300 (Del.)(HC) 5. CIT Vs. Meenakshi Overseas Pvt. Ltd. (2017) 395 ITR 677 (Del) (HC) 6. CIT Vs. Fair Invest Ltd. (2013) 357 ITR 146 (Del.)(HC) 7. Sarthak Securities Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. ITO (2010) 329 ITR 110. 4. It is further contended that the assessee was not provided opportunity to cross examine Shri Deepak Gupta and Directo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the information received from the third parties without giving opportunity of cross examination, such proceedings are contrary to the principles of natural justice. It is also contended that non providing of the opportunity of cross examination has caused serious prejudice to the assessee. Moreover, it is stated that there is no whisper of any payment paid other than the payment described in the registered sale deed. I have given my thoughtful consideration to the facts of the present case and the material placed before me. So far the contention of the assessee that A.O. ought to have verified the veracity of information received which suggested escapement of income in my view is devoid of any merit. The A.O. has to form a belief that cert....